Supreme Court situation could expose Indian tribes to new risks that are legal

Professor of Law & Director for the native Law & Policy Center, Michigan State University

Disclosure statement

Matthew L.M. Fletcher works well with eight Indian tribes as a judge that is appellateGrand Traverse Band of Ottawa and Chippewa Indians, Hoopa Valley Tribe, Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe, Nottawaseppi Huron Band regarding the Potawatomi, Match-E-Be-Nash-She-Wish Band of Pottawatomi Indians, Poarch Band of Creek Indians, Pokagon Band of Potawatomi Indians, and Santee Sioux Tribe). He could be connected to the Grand Traverse Band of Ottawa and Chippewa Indians as a member that is enrolled.


Michigan State University provides capital as a founding partner of this Conversation US.

Accidents happen. And quite often those accidents involve the staff of Indian tribes. The Supreme Court is planned to know situation that may rule in the the restrictions of appropriate resistance of tribes and their staff. The case could expose Indian tribes to unexpected – and significant – liability in state and federal courts to which tribes are strangers although it deals with a narrow question in a personal injury lawsuit.

In Lewis v. Clarke, the Supreme Court will deal with whether a tribal casino worker – in cases like this, a limo driver – may be sued for an accident that took place as the worker ended up being in the clock but outside of Indian lands.

Being a scholar, We have examined the complexities of tribal sovereign immunity, tribal government-owned organizations together with unique challenges Indian tribes face in federal and state courts. 继续阅读Supreme Court situation could expose Indian tribes to new risks that are legal